Read: Legs by William Kennedy.
Okay, I posted about this book and I e-mailed my father about it and I complained to Brian about it. I said that I hated it. And I really did want to hate it. It was about John/Jack/Legs/whatever you want to call him Diamond, a man who made lots of money and was very rarely successfully prosecuted because he had friends in high places in Albany during Prohibition. I don't like violence, and there is a significant amount of violence - shooting, punching, killing animals (pet peeve of mine, for what it's worth), and some light torture.
The book was told from the point of view of Jack's lawyer, although it strangely slips into a third-person narrative every once in a while, referring to the lawyer by his first name, which also annoys me. And Amazon says that the book humanizes Jack and makes you like him, and it didn't do that to me, either. I don't like people who kill animals and people. I don't care if they buy an organ for the church or not.
So it had a lot of reasons for me to hate it, but to be honest, I didn't. The problem is that the book was written pretty well. It was easy to read. It was interesting. The dialogue read like how a real person would talk, not how some stilted first-novel gangsters would talk.
I wouldn't read it again, but if the author wrote something with a little less violence, I might read it. (And I'll probably have to if I keep reading my grandmother's favorites. This was on there, as well as two other books by the same author - and she read another five of his books that didn't make the favorites list. As a side note, she read this book in the year I was born, probably right around the same time of year that I was born - 27 years ago this month.)
That's 43 books for the year.
Next up, a book that was on my grandmother's favorites list - and was also recommended to me by the doctor running a medical study in which I am participating.
Okay, I posted about this book and I e-mailed my father about it and I complained to Brian about it. I said that I hated it. And I really did want to hate it. It was about John/Jack/Legs/whatever you want to call him Diamond, a man who made lots of money and was very rarely successfully prosecuted because he had friends in high places in Albany during Prohibition. I don't like violence, and there is a significant amount of violence - shooting, punching, killing animals (pet peeve of mine, for what it's worth), and some light torture.
The book was told from the point of view of Jack's lawyer, although it strangely slips into a third-person narrative every once in a while, referring to the lawyer by his first name, which also annoys me. And Amazon says that the book humanizes Jack and makes you like him, and it didn't do that to me, either. I don't like people who kill animals and people. I don't care if they buy an organ for the church or not.
So it had a lot of reasons for me to hate it, but to be honest, I didn't. The problem is that the book was written pretty well. It was easy to read. It was interesting. The dialogue read like how a real person would talk, not how some stilted first-novel gangsters would talk.
I wouldn't read it again, but if the author wrote something with a little less violence, I might read it. (And I'll probably have to if I keep reading my grandmother's favorites. This was on there, as well as two other books by the same author - and she read another five of his books that didn't make the favorites list. As a side note, she read this book in the year I was born, probably right around the same time of year that I was born - 27 years ago this month.)
That's 43 books for the year.
Next up, a book that was on my grandmother's favorites list - and was also recommended to me by the doctor running a medical study in which I am participating.
3 comments | Leave a comment

